| Jacqueline Rowley via nettime-l on Fri, 13 Nov 2026 13:54:03 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> Institute of Network Cultures 2.0 - update on changes |
Reading this through in a careful way, but wanted to say immediately that I would love to be a part of things beyond the paid membership. Excited to join whatever emerges. On Fri, Nov 13, 2026 at 12:00 PM Geert Lovink via nettime-l < nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> wrote: > Dear nettimers, > > it’s early in the process but we would like to update you about the recent > changes at our Institute of Network Cultures. As you may know: due to > Geert's mandatory retirement at 67, the INC (founded in 2004) left the > HvA/polytechnic over the summer and became an independent (legal) > entity/NGO. There is now a board of the society (vereniging), a bank > account and a collective. We will soon make next steps, hopefully together > with new partners and authors, creating a larger support group for those > not based in Amsterdam or the Netherlands. If you are interested in > joining, please let us know. > > In the meanwhile, the website continues and is actually doing very well ( > https://www.networkcultures.org). > However, many readers will not realize that INC has dropped down to zero > staff, zero Euros and no office. For instance, we will no longer send out > paper publications. In this situation we are particularly interested to get > support from all of you. Think of us please. We are very keen to, for > instance, join consortia in EU applications and other forms of > collaboration. Should INC become a think tank, merge with others in order > to get larger grants? How do you think in what direction independent > research, theory and criticism, made in Euroipe, should go? > > There is an internal working document from summer 2026 (see below) that > gives a detailed overview of the thematic directions of our current work > (apart from working on the website). > > One of the first things that will happen is the launch of the Girl Theory > Reader, published by Set Margins’ and edited by Mela Miekus and Mita Medri, > on December 10. Then there is partication of INC members in the > Transmediale project called Solidarity Economies Lab (live late January, in > Berlin), there are the ongoing digital publishing expertiments (with a > focus on Etherport). And, last but not least, the live stream art events of > VOID, coordinated by Tommaso, Jordi and Giulia, will also continue. > > Some of the publishing will continue, like the Theory on Demand series and > the INC Longforms. We might line up with publishers for paper publications > in the near future. > > There is a core group, in Amsterdam, a collective of around seven members > that is running the INC. As said, soon we will provide a bigger group for > others, outside of Amsterdam and NL. We will have tools and possibilities > how to join INC in the wider context and support it. For now, the most > basic costs are covered but we urgently need our own meeting/work space and > coordination person who do stuff, at least one day a week. > > There was an assembly during the successful INC Exit Fest late June and we > are implementing the suggestions made there. What’s to be done? You can > find the program and background here: > https://etherport.org/publications/inc/Exit_Fest/chapters/program.html. > > Please contact us at info@networkcultures.org. > > Everyone can become a member of the INC society. The contribution is (at > least) 12 euro every three months or 48 euro a year. If you live in an IBAN > country you can sign up here: > > https://app.clubcollect.com/signup/978e9974-7b06-4260-9d90-f204cf0b4000 > > If you are based in a non-IBAN country, please sign up here: > > https://app.clubcollect.com/signup/d1208433-0598-4bd4-ab64-5cf4d317e92d > > Yours, the INC Collective > > — > > Here are some of the topics we will work on: > > 1. Expanded publishing and the further development of Etherport > > Digital publishing has always been a core activity of INC. In recent years > we’ve focusing on the research part and applied the > hybrid-urgent-multimedia insights in a ever growing variety of series and > combination of media and technologies. At the moment, full video > integration is a hot item. This is done through/with our video collective > VOID. Another emphasis is on the further development of the Etherport > software (together with Gijs de Heij) that finally makes it possible to do > book design without Adobe/InDesign . The Tactical Media reader is INC > Etherport #4. We discuss if we this series continues or whether a new, even > more simplified Etherport series will be developed. At the same time the > Theory on Demand series is continued: much to our own surprise #62 is in > production. > > Print on demand is here to stay. At the same time we will look for more > collaborations with Set Margins’ (even though this already exists with the > books of Silvio, Morgane and Maisa). Continuation of the website and > perhaps start of a new website Is it good idea to continue the existing > Tuxic hosted WordPress structure or do we want something else on the long > run? Wordpress got recently hacked (and so did INC, but who didn’t?). There > is something to be said to close and conserve the current WP site start > from scratch – but we won’t do that (yet). That’s going to be hard > considering we have find an office, funding etc. Over the past 6-10 months > we have been working intensely to clean up the existing site and it is now > stable. We are moving our videos from Vimeo to Internet Archive. All photos > will be removed from Flickr. What else? How about the podcasts? The > WordPress site will remain agile, around 50 GB, primarily blog postings, > longforms and pdfs. The website runs well and attracts lots of visitors. > Many reader may not even notice the transition into NGO status that is > about to happen. > > 2. The future of streaming, the VOID and podcasting > > Renting an indy space in 2025 at Surinameplein in Amsterdam was a strong > and inspiring ‘spin-off’ gesture of the VOID collective to take the INC > transition into their own hand. The VOID is important for the continuity of > INC. At the same time, it is also a possibility to take this activity in > another direction, entirely separate from INC 2.0 itself. This can also be > said of the publishing house and the research institute itself (as a > separate think tank). Live streaming and doing hands-on applied video > research is an integral part of the INC legacy, going back to Geert’s early > 1990s Mediamatic Years (hopefully out soon as a collection), the Next Five > Minutes tactical television saga up to the VideoVortex network (the longest > active INC network, since 2006), leading up to the Stream Art Network that > hopefully will grow in the coming period. More members, streaming theory > and software are a priority here. > > 3. The discussion on art and precarity > > This has always remained a core mission of INC 1.0, also for INC 2.0. A > strategic ‘bridge’ moment was the launch of Sepp Eckenhaussen’s book > Goodbye Poverty Jetset (https://humdrumpress.com/goodbye-poverty-jetset). > With the slow but devastating dismantling of the arts and cultural > institutions plus education, on top of rising costs and budget cuts, this > topic will only get more urgent. See also the upcoming Solidarity Economies > Lab at Transmediale. > > 4. Focus on girl theory > > Slowly INC has been building up a strong publishing practice around ‘girl > theory’. This is culminating late 2026 in the publishing with Set Margins’ > of the Girl Theory Reader, edited by Mela Miekus and Mita Medri. We did not > have girl theory as a separate theme during Exit Fest on the topic itself > as we’ve covered it already in 2025 during one of the VOID nights at OT301. > However, it is also a section in the INC Reader #18, This Can’t be the > Place: > https://networkcultures.org/blog/publication/this-cant-be-the-place-alternative-theories-of-the-internet/. > > > 5. Beyond ethics and the refusal gesture: alternatives to the AI logic > > Due to high demand it is inevitable that we continue and expand the work > of Jordi Viader, Eke Reebergen and others around the ‘critique and refusal > of AI’ topic. The pressure on INC to do ‘something’ with AI from outside > should not be underestimated. However, a closer look at the website learns > that quite a high percentage of the postings deal directly with AI-related > topics. However, most associate INC with ‘the internet’ as a topic of the > past. There is a popular belief amongst officials that people no longer use > platforms, they work with AI. Authorities have tried to convince INC to > stop working on social media. This may be an understandable sentiment: in > the fashion logic things come and go (and return as vintage tech). Platform > will go out of fashion, as networks and new media once did (but is this in > fact wishful thinking?). This still presumes a hypergrowth pre-2016 > dynamics that does not take recession, stagnation and the rise of > reactionary Big Tech aka techno-fascism into account. Beyond the burst of > the AI financial bubble, automation of mediocre jobs is going to stay with > us. For INC, this is a tricky subject to include: people love talking about > ‘AI’ and soon there will be no other topic to talk about (incl. funding). > Still, what’s to be done if one looks down on the poverty of vectorial > capitalism? > > 6. From mapping social media blues to alternatives > > The turning point here is 2016. Until then, INC focused on expansion of > the internet and the critique of applications such as online video, > Wikipedia, crypto, social networking, search engines etc. For a decade the > focus has shifted to the mental turn, when user culture itself became the > object of extractivist business and surveillance. In line with changing > funding structures and the political climate, INC started to look inwards > and map the disturbing mental landscape inside the abyss, resulting into > the INC Reader #18, This Can’t Be the Place. and the reader Fragments of > Tactical Media. We will continue with this track; the issues are simply too > huge, and the real existing depression invite lots of interesting artists > and writers to send us material. However, we need to get more visibly > involved in the promotion of alternatives. To break the silence over the > monopoly of Instagram in the art world could be one. We got Etherport but > what else could be a unique INC contribution in this field? How to > create/join coalitions that promote the long-awaited exodus? > > 7. The Spanish-language section Internet Core (written by Diana Millán) > > In 2025, INC opened a space for decentralized internet art in Spanish > called Internet Core (https://networkcultures.org/internetcore/). This > dedicated website caters to digital native practices with -core from the > dark forest to the clearnet and the digital exodus to new federated social > media platforms since 2020-now. In this period, IC is a political and > collective tool that, from commercial networks and online subcultures, > seeks to return to the critical core of the network through creation, > reflection, and hybrid spaces of encounter (academic, artistic, and > community-based) that escape the programmatic isolation of Big-Tech. > > In one year the project posted a dozen essays from artists and colectives > and did 4 events in different important venues like Hangar, Santa Mònica > (Barcelona), Medialab Matadero (Madrid) and Medialab (Mexico City). After > the first meeting arranged by Diana Millán, Geert Lovink and Ezequiel > Soriano in Barcelona, the institute has received stays from two predoctoral > researchers: Raquel Luaces and Laura Subirats. It is a powerful node for > continuing to materialize meeting spaces that encourage reflection on > current i-Gen issues. During Diana Millán's PhD thesis process, it could be > materialized as a book and we are working now on zines and a alternative > website. Actualy, we are going to present Doreen A. Ríos and Valentina > Tanni books in Spain and we applied to some open calls for founding. Some > institutions like Medialab Madrid are open to host INC/IC. The IC members > has been shaped through encounters and evolves according to the actions it > undertakes. > > -- > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: https://www.nettime.org > # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org > -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org