Ivo Skoric on Sun, 28 Oct 2001 02:55:23 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Accidentally, one more time |
How many times do you thing Pentagon is able to bomb Red Cross warehouses in Kabul accidentally? So far, they admited to have done it twice. Would anybody bet that it can happen a third time? Or maybe even a fourth? Meanwhile, the aid agencies like Oxfam, ICRC and MSF are asking the US to stop dropping food on Afghanistan. They are fine with the US amateurish dispensing of its expensive ordnance over the vast Afghan mountainous dessert, with occassional children assassinating blunder, but would like that US, please, leave the aid delivery to professionals. And the USA Patriot act is in force now. The law on the books is nothing without the implementation. So we should see how worse did the US become in terms of its liberties in the course of implementation of that act. Abroad, sadly, everybody took an opportunity to join in the global misbehavior. Macedonians vs. Albanian minority. Israelis vs. Palestinians. Russians vs. Chechens. Chinese vs. Uighurs. US, indeed, takes pains to declare that not all Muslims are terrorists, but in the other parts of the world such thinking is regarded as the expensive luxury and best avoided. ivo Date sent: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 02:42:16 -0400 Send reply to: International Justice Watch Discussion List <JUSTWATCH-L@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU> From: Daniel Tomasevich <danilo@MARTNET.COM> Subject: Agencies call on U.S. to end food drops To: JUSTWATCH-L@LISTSERV.ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU Humanitarian agencies that distribute food in Afghanistan say the food drops are making things worse. They could deliver food much cheaper by land. Daniel (article not for cross posting) ------------------------------------------------------------- The Ottawa Citizen October 26, 2001 Friday Agencies call on U.S. to end food drops BY: Kate Jaimet Humanitarian workers are being put in danger by the American policy of air-dropping food into Afghanistan, field workers for Oxfam, the International Red Cross and Doctors Without Borders said yesterday. "Our staff are in danger. If one side of the conflict perceives that the other is using humanitarian aid as a weapon of war, we could be perceived as the enemy and therefore our staff could be targeted," said Mark Fried, communications and advocacy co-ordinator for Oxfam Canada. "We're quite concerned that this blurring of the line between humanitarian and military is dangerous to our staff on the ground and ultimately dangerous to the whole effort of providing humanitarian relief." Meanwhile, Lai Ling Lee, program director for Doctors Without Borders, bluntly called on the Americans to stop the food drops. In an attempt to show that its bombing campaign is aimed at terrorists, not at Afghani civilians, the United States has dropped more than 700,000 packages of single-serving food rations that include vegetarian entrees and rice-based nutrition bars. But Mr. Fried said the rations are reaching only one per cent of the people in need. He characterized the price of the rations as "obscene," saying that it cost $27 million to distribute 130,000 meals by air -- about $207 per meal -- while Oxfam could distribute roughly the same amount of food by land for less than 3.5 cents a meal. Attempts by aid groups to distribute food by land have almost ceased in Afghanistan, as the U.S. refuses to pause its bombing and the Taliban refuses to provide protection to aid workers threatened by thieves, looters and pillaging soldiers. Seven million people are said to be at risk of starvation inside Afghanistan. _________________________________________________________________ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net