On August 20 [1998] the United States launched a 
            series of cruise missile attacks against alleged terrorist camps in 
            Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, both of 
            which were said to be under the control of a rabid Islamic 
            fundamentalist leader and arch terrorist named Osama bin-Laden. I 
            did some checking on bin-Laden and what I found out leads me to 
            suspect that the CIA and the U.S. government would rather have this 
            evil terrorist hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan than answering 
            questions which might embarrass them.
            Shortly after the Russians invaded Afghanistan, the 
            young and wealthy Saudi Arabian named bin-Laden rushed to Afghani 
            mountains to fight a Muslim holy war against Godless Communism. 
            Having inherited more than thirty million dollars from his father's 
            construction business he was in a position to lend immediate help to 
            the struggling Afghani freedom fighters. He formed quick alliances 
            among the half dozen or so major factions of the Mujahedeen led by 
            Afghani Sheik Hekmatyar.
            US records indicate that we spent nearly $3 billion 
            dollars over the next eight years to train and equip the Afghan 
            rebels. We even supplied them with Stinger missiles, which caused 
            great concern in later years as we began to fear they would be 
            turned against us. The U.S. Congress appropriated ransom money to 
            buy them back in the early 90s. Few were recovered. In addition the 
            CIA, under Bill Casey, sponsored an explosion in the heroin trade to 
            finance the war. This was nothing new.
            In 1979, when the Soviet invasion occurred, 
            virtually none of the heroin entering the US came from the so-called 
            Golden Crescent in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. At the time it 
            was coming from Mexico and Southeast Asia. By 1982 the region was 
            producing exportable opium base equivalent to 20-30 tons of heroin a 
            year. Of that, at least 4.5 tons reached the U.S. By 1988 those 
            numbers had increased to 70 to 80 tons of heroin of which 15 to 20 
            tons reached the US.
            According to Alfred McCoy, in his outstanding book 
            The Politics of Heroin (Lawrence Hill Books, 1972, 1991), 
            Hekmatyar controlled no less than six heroin refineries in the 
            Khyber District of Pakistan alone. At his side was Osama 
            bin-Laden.
            Around the time that Osama bin-Laden moved to 
            Afghanistan in 1980 he was also curiously able to found a series of 
            investment companies under the umbrella SICO which he headquartered 
            in Geneva. Sources formerly in the intelligence community have 
            confirmed to me that, as bin-Laden established branches in the 
            Cayman islands and the Bahamas, he employed law firms and 
            consultants connected to Langley, Virginia and the CIA.
            Throughout the Afghan war bin-Laden grew in 
            reputation as a fearless leader and devout Muslim. His wealth also 
            increased rapidly. I wonder why? By the end of the war and the 
            Soviet withdrawal he was known throughout Africa and the Middle East 
            as a radical fundamentalist leader who had turned his sights against 
            the U.S. But this was not without creating enemies both in 
            Afghanistan and his home country of Saudi Arabia, which drew ever 
            more securely into the U.S. sphere - especially during and after the 
            Gulf War.
            In the early 1990s bin-Laden took up sanctuary in 
            the Sudan and was afforded a kind of safe haven. He threw himself 
            into massive construction projects including road building. The 
            Sudanese government has admitted that it had an agreement with the 
            U.S. to monitor bin-Laden and to curtail his terrorist activities. 
            In exchange for this Sudan received unspecified rewards. It is, 
            therefore, mystifying as to why, with bin-Laden under scrutiny in 
            the reasonably accessible and penetrable Sudan, the U.S. government 
            forced the Sudanese government to expel him in 1995. This drove him 
            back into the arms of the increasingly hostile Taliban militia in 
            Afghanistan. There, he re-established relations with Afghani drug 
            lords in the towns of Jhost and Jalalabad.
            When the U.S. cruise missiles struck the El-Shifa 
            pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, a host of conflicting stories 
            appeared as to who owned the plant and when it was built. The 
            British turned up a man named Tom Carnaffin who claimed to have 
            helped build the plant and manage it from 1992 through 1996. Other 
            records and sources indicated, however, that the plant was not built 
            until 1996. Carnaffin claimed that he was intimately familiar with 
            the plant and that it could not have produced nerve agents as the 
            U.S. claimed. Later the U.S. backed down and said that it didn’t 
            have proof that bin-Laden owned the plant. In the meantime about 
            four other people were named who reportedly did. Some of them didn’t 
            know each other.
            What really got my attention was the fact that the 
            French Internet publication, Indigo, reported that bin-Laden had 
            been a London guest of British Intelligence as recently as 1996 and 
            his treasurer, last year, defected to the Saudis as different 
            factions shifted alliances for new campaigns in the Middle East. If 
            the guy travels to London and has businesses in the Caymans and 
            Geneva, how difficult can he be to find? Why did the British stand 
            so resolutely behind the American attacks?
            Murky? You bet. Fishy? Absolutely. It may be 
            entirely possible that the plant in the Sudan was storing databases 
            for Iraqi chem and biowar agents. It may well be that the plant even 
            had silent investors connected to Sadam Hussein and thence, back 
            here in the States.
            Maybe when I have a couple of thousand subscribers 
            and a staff I'll be able to spend the time digging into stories like 
            this one. But one thing's for sure, Osama bin-Laden is in a place 
            where CIA can't reach him right now and I bet they want it that way. 
            Like so many other terrorists, from the World Trade Center, to Pan 
            Am 103, he is one of their own creations.
            As my good friend, Producer Marc Levin, points out, 
            the CIA has a term for it when one of their operations goes awry and 
            turns ugly, "It's called 'Blowback'." Levin produced an outstanding 
            1997 six hour documentary on CIA for PBS entitled, "CIA - 
            America's Secret Warriors " If you haven't seen it I highly 
            recommend it as not only basic reference but great 
entertainment.
            [Special thanks to Ralph McGehee's CIA BASE 
            Program, Alfred McCoy's, The Politics of Heroin and various 
            unnamed sources who prefer it that-a-way.]